We Got Next: NIT Edition

Just in case you couldn't get enough of ESPN force feeding you Women's NCAA Tournament action, (I particularly enjoy their promo commercial featuring that very scary women screaming a lot at the end) there is something out there to wet the appetites of you Women's basketball fans. The tournament that features the best of the rest, the Women's NIT.

When I first heard that there was a Women's NIT, I thought it was an elaborate hoax. But upon further investigation I learned that it indeed was real, and apparently all inclusive. As evidenced by the 48 teams that it features each season. 48 teams? Does every collegiate women's program get to take part in some sort of post-season tournament? Do they invite a few high school teams to participate?

After perusing the Women's NIT website for about 10 minutes (it was all I could bring myself to look at it for) I learned that the final will take place this Saturday, on the national stage, in Wyoming. As the Wisconsin Badgers will take on the Wyoming Cow....girls? It should be a heated match up followed closely around the country. In fact, 11 regional networks have signed up to broadcast it, including 3 more on tape delay. Such nationally recognized syndicates such as WKYU Bowling Green, KY and Wisconsin Public TV (on tape delay).

The other interesting thing about this tournament is the fact that the selection process involves 31 automatic berths, with no explanation from the website as to what qualifies as an automatic berth. Is it the best team not to make the NCAA tournament? The team with the prettiest uniforms? Or the team that has nothing better to do?

As I'm sure the selection committee faces every year, this year brought with it much criticism of the selection process. How do you not include Texas? I mean seriously? We have pedigree, a legendary coach, and are better than probably half the teams in the field. I'm just hoping that we were invited and our coach said, "No, I'm better than that." But still, it would've been great to see our ladies go out on top in Wyoming, because they would've gotten there, oh yes, they would've gotten there.

But this obviously was not our year, so we'll have to sit back and watch the Cowgirls and Badgers battle it out, for the chance to etch their names in history, as the 2007 NIT Champions. Be sure to tune in on Saturday to Fox Sports Net Arizona (on tape delay) to see who will be taking home the hardware. And don't you worry, next year, Drinking the Forty will be ready, brackets in hand, for the 2008 Women's NIT Pick'em Pool.

"Why Does Rice Play Texas?"

Of course this quote from John F. Kennedy, comparing that to questions about our goal of landing on the moon, is from 1962. However, that futility still seemed to still ring true Tuesday night as the #9 Longhorn baseball team took care of the #8 Rice Owls 6-4.

Starter Austin Wood turned in a solid start for the Horns going 5.2 innings, giving up 3 hits and 2 runs (none of the runs were earned). Pat McCroy, Joseph Krebs and Randy Boone pitched the rest of the way, only giving up 3 hits and 2 unearned runs. Rice starter Chris Kelley only went 4.0 innings and gave up 3 earned runs on 5 hits.

Down 2-1 in the 5th, Texas hitters broke out with 4 runs over the next 2 innings. In the bottom of the 5th, Chance Wheeless doubled home Travis Tucker and Wheeless was brought in on a sacrifice fly by Russell Moldenhauer. Tucker scored again in the 6th, along with Nick Peoples to put Texas up for good. The Horns also received solo home runs from Kyle Russell and Moldenhauer.

Joe Savery led the way for the Owls with a 2-4 night and 1 run scored. Rice led Texas 2-1 going into the bottom of the 5th, but Texas put up 2 runs in the inning. After the Horns were up 5-2, Rice put up a 2 run 7th to get the score to 5-4. But that is as close as Rice would get as Texas put up a run in the bottom of the inning, putting an end to the Owl threat.

The win was Texas' 10th in their last 11 and pushes the Longhorns overall record to 23-8. The loss dropped the Owls to 19-10. Kyle Russell's home run was his 16th of the season. Texas has a huge series, this weekend with the #17 Oklahoma Sooners who are 2-1 in Big 12 play.

Coaching search update...

I don't think I mentioned last time that I would happily be wrong if Texas went a direction other than Kim Mulkey - but I would be. Word is out that Texas has asked permission to speak with Duke's Gail Goestenkors and will be talking to her today. Now this is an addition I would gladly welcome to the Texas staff and I think she would fit in quite well. Her reserved on the court demeanor, and her reputation as a solid recruiter fall right into line among Texas coaches. I think it will be a hard sell to get her away from the success she's been having at Duke (4 of the past 6 Final Fours, but granted she did have Alana Beard, one of the best player's to hit the women's game in the past 10 years, for most of those), but being offered double your current salary would peak anyone's interest. Of course, Texas won't be the only one with their eye on Goestenkors, so we'll see what happens...

Short stay in Miami?

The ACC is not for the feint of heart. The ACC is a conference made up of a few perennial powerhouses, several teams that spend several years at the top and take one or two years to rebuild, and the rest are teams that fight year in and year out to breakthrough. Florida State is annually on the cusp as a team looking to break through, while Virginia Tech is a team that broke through this year. Coming into his third season, Frank Haith's Miami program was a team that had spent the previous two seasons along side Florida State, fighting to belong. This season, that plan unraveled.

In the pressure packed world of major college sports, coaches are forced to win now. They face the extremely difficult task of taking a program that has struggled, winning with the talent they currently have in house, while turning the program into a major contender by attracting top recruits. It's the inability to win with the talent in house, while convincing top recruits to come to a program that hasn't won yet, where coaches most often meet their doom. In a conference where no game is an easy win, this task proves close to impossible.

Coming off a 12-20 season, finishing dead last in the ACC with a 4-12 mark, Coach Haith will begin to feel the pressure in his fourth season. After two NIT appearances, and never finishing above .500 in conference, Miami will begin to expect results. The question facing Haith, will be whether his team, one made up of mostly his recruits now, will be able to grow up and succeed in the pressure cooker of the ACC quickly enough. Furthermore, what level of improvement will be demanded of Haith to keep his job?

After going 16-13 and 18-16 over his first two seasons, Haith's Miami team fell apart this season after losing guard Guillermo Diaz, who foolishly declared early for the NBA draft (and went undrafted), and losing center Anthony King to injury. Diaz and King were supposed to be the strength inside and outside for this team, allowing top recruits to slowly work their way into the flow of the system. What looked to be a promising season quickly thrust young unproven recruits into the limelight. Sophomores Jack McClinton, Brian Asbury, and Denis Clemente led the way for a Miami team that featured three sophomores and a freshman in the starting lineup. In the talent-filled ACC this quickly led to its undoing as the team fell apart, finishing 4-12 in conference. They showed signs of life towards the end of the season, upsetting Maryland in the first round of the ACC tournament before falling by three to Boston College.

With McClinton and Clemente emerging this season as the solid back court of the future, the questions of Miami's success will lie inside. Sophomore Brian Asbury played well in the small forward position (11.7 ppg/5.9 rpg), but Miami will need freshman Dwayne Collins to become a true force inside. Whether that will become a reality is yet to be seen, but Haith has no shortage of bodies to use, to see what he can get out of his post players. Jimmy Graham (SO), Raymond Hicks (JR), Fabio Nass (FR), and Lawerence Gilbert (FR) will all get their chance to fight for minutes for the Hurricanes. Joining them will be incoming freshman Freddy Asprilla and Julian Gamble, both 6'9".

From this talented, young group, Coach Haith will have to find out who is ready to grow up and accept the challenge that lies before them next season. Anything short of an NCAA birth might not be enough to keep Haith's job, depending on how understanding Miami is. Given their handling of the Larry Coker situation, he might be given enough time to let the kids grow up next season, before his job is on the line the following year. Drastic improvement will be hard to come by in the ACC, especially with a team that will still be relatively young next season. However, if Haith can get to .500 in the ACC next season, he will most likely have done enough to save his job for one more year. If he is able to get to that point, this team should be one that could finally be ready to breakthrough and be a contender in the ACC on an annual basis.

Catching Up With: Rookie 'Horns

What if? That's all we can ask at this point. Texas bowed out of the NCAA Tourney with an early, embarrassing loss to the USC Trojans. But what if? What if Texas had not been depleted by defections to the NBA last year? What would the fate of this year's team been? How would any team been able to stop a line up with P.J. Tucker, LaMarcus Aldridge, Daniel Gibson, A.J. Abrams and Kevin Durant? Well, we will never know. But lets take a look to see how the Texas early NBA entries faired for themselves as rookies...

Daniel Gibson- G -Cleveland Cavaliers: You know, even if Gibson doesn't make it as an NBA star, he can always tell his grandkids he played with Bron Bron, right? DGib hasn't been a total disappointment, but he hasn't been much of a contributor. His season averages total 4.9ppg, 1.6rpg and 1.4apg. Hardly world beating. But given the chance to start during the injury of Larry Hughes, Gibson showed signs of possibly being a contributor on the pro level. During his 5 game stint in the starting line up, Daniel put up 10 points a game and a 3-2 record. After that short foray into significant playing time, Gibson saw more of the court in February, upping his scoring average to 7.4ppg. DGib has returned to playing time after spraining a toe in early March. Overall, you would have to say this year has been a success for Daniel. He has improved this year and showed that he can contribute at the pro level. And he's getting paid. Overall grade for the decision to go pro: B-

LaMarcus Aldridge- C - Portland Trailblazers: By far the best year of the Texas rookie class. His stats so far this year are 9.1ppg, 5rpg and 1.16bpg. Though his playing time has been inconstant (and sometimes quite spotty), LA has put together a very impressive last month of the season. In March, LA has been seeing about 35 mins/game and averaged 16.4ppg and 8.5rpg. In three of his last five games, he has put up over 20 pts and on the 23rd, LA poured in a 27pt 14 rebound game (his best as a pro). Aldridge is becoming stronger in the post and has adapted to the pro level. LA has even cracked the starting lineup towards the end of the year. Overall, this year has been a success for Aldridge. Look for a solid year, next year while LA progresses as a solid NBA star. Overall grade for the decision to go pro: A-

P.J. Tucker- PF- (Formerly) Toronto Raptor/Colorado 14ers: What can you say? Everyone at Texas loved PJ, his work ethic and everything he did for the 'Horns. But I think we all knew that he was going to struggle as a pro. He is your classic 'tweener' with no real strength or position suited for the next level. And so it seems P.J. might be destined to go the way of James Thomas. A hard working, undersized, big man who really needed to have more of an offensive threat to make it in The League. PJ was with the Raptors for a total of 17 games and averaged less than 2 points. He as sent down to the NBDL's Colorado 14ers where he played in 19 games where he averaged 10.7ppg and 3.37rpg. Tucker was released March 24th to make room for Luke Jackson on the roster. PJ will probably give the NBA more shots, but will probably join the many US players in the European Leagues.

But lets take a closer look at PJ to see if he really made the right decision. What if he had come back for his senior year? Would his NBA status be any different? I actually think PJ did the right thing for himself. He got drafted 35th in the NBA draft and signed a $412,718 contract. The thing is, that is as good as Tucker could have ever done. There is no way he would have been drafted this year with as deep and talented a draft as the 2007 draft will be (not to mention the drop in stats after KD's arrival). He would have been left to fend for a free agent contract, which would not have been likely. PJ will, ultimately, end up on the court in Europe. And, is that really that bad? Salaries in the Euro Leagues run in the 6 figures and PJ will most likely be one of the better players there. So even though PJ isn't going to make it in the NBA, he made the right decision to leave Texas in 2006 by heeding the call of The Steve Miller Band by deciding to 'take the money and run.' Congrats to you PJ. You came out at the exact right time and got the best deal possible. So, kudos to you and surprisingly you will be get the highest grade of the UT rookies. Overall grade for the decision to go pro: A+

We're taking it up a notch

Just when you didn't think it could get any crazier after Steve Alford was indeed leaving Iowa for New Mexico, it did. Tubby Smith is leaving the Kentucky Wildcats, where he has won a national championship and coached the past 10 seasons, for that basketball juggernaut, Minnesota.

While the pressure on Tubby Smith continued to rise over the past three semi-disappointing seasons, Florida won a national championship, Tennessee returned to prominence, and Vanderbilt started playing basketball again. During this period, it had appeared that Tubby had grown tired of the pressure packed situation, as one could begin to wonder while watching him on the sidelines, whether Tubby had a pulse. I'm not sure if this counts as a retirement from basketball, or whether he could get more naps while coaching in the Big Ten, but Tubby Smith will take over a Minnesota program that is absolutely delighted to get him. You can't particularly blame him though, the pressure had overwhelmed him at Kentucky, and for $1.8 million dollars a year at a program that will be delighted with an NCAA birth every year without expectations rising for at least 10 years, I'd go too.

The interesting part of this story will be the off-season coaching carousel that will ensue. With Iowa, Michigan, and Kentucky all searching for head coaches, there should be a long list of names moving locales. Kentucky is at the top of that list, with its tradition and fan base, it is probably one of the top 10 coaching jobs in the country. Whatever schools they go visit, the coach there will at least have to listen. Among early mentions for the position, are Billy Donovan (Florida), Tom Crean (Marquette), Tom Izzo (Michigan State), John Calipari (Memphis), Mark Few (Gonzaga), Mike Brey (Notre Dame), Rick Barnes (Texas), Billy Gillespie (Texas A&M), and Jay Wright (Villanova). While Donovan is extremely unlikely, any other candidate on that list would at least have to listen. Wherever they do get their head coach from, it should set off a chain reaction leading to several coaches switching programs.

So many decisions and variables factor into these decisions, such as timing, money, the program, the coaches current program, their relationship with that program. You never know which coach would surprisingly turn down an offer and another coach surprisingly accept an offer. Needless to say it's frightening to see Barnes' name on that list, and while I like to think he wouldn't leave, he's from North Carolina and Kentucky is a basketball first, historic program. Let's just hope that Kevin Durant stays, and the point is moot.

Texas' Boys of Summer Are Hot

The Texas baseball team continues to perform strong after besting Texas State for their 7th straight victory. Augie-ball is alive and well as the 20-7 Longhorns are currently ranked no. 1o by Baseball America. This winning streak included a sweep of Big 12 rival Baylor over last weekend, putting the Horns on top of the Big 12 (3-0).

Sophomore third baseman Bradley Suttle leads the Longhorn offense batting .425, 32 RBIs and 6 HRs. Kyle Russell has also knocked 13 dingers (leads the nation), batted in 33 runs and hit a a .387 clip. The Horns' offense is strong again, as it was last year. Five players (Suttle, Russell, Chance Wheeless, Travis Tucker and Jordan Danks) are all batting over .340. Of course, I am pretty sure Augie is the MacGyver of baseball coaches. The way MacGyver can make a bomb out of a potato, a match and a shoe string, Augie can make a run out of a walk, a hit batsman and a bunt.

But, the biggest improvement Texas has seen this season is from th pitching staff. Right away you can see the difference a more controlled pitching staff can make. Last season Texas pitchers allowed about 4 walks a game and that number has been cut to 2.6 per game this year. Ardain Alaniz leads the staff with a 5-1 record. Adrian has posted a 2.31 ERA and has been only allowing opponents to bat .213 off of him this year.

But Alaniz is not the only Horn to pitch well the year. Texas has at least 6 other hurlers that have had outstanding years thus far. James Russell, Joseph Krebs, Austin Wood, Randy Boone, Keith Shinaberry, and Pat McCrory have all put together solid years.

Texas’ goal this year is the same as it is every year. Anything short of a birth in the College World Series and a national Championship will not do for this squad (We all know how much Augie dislikes second place). The Horns’ certainly have the makings of a team that is primed to continue this win streak in conference play and throughout the post season.

It is worth noting that this weekend against Baylor saw a milestone. With the sweep over the Bears, Texas took the all-time conference lead in wins (173 wins to Baylor’s 169). This extends Texas’ win lead over Colorado to 173 games (yes, I know CU doesn’t play baseball).

Coaches Like Kevin Durant; Oscar Robertson and Dr. Naismith still unsure

One of the great things about college sports is that anyone that feels like it can give an award.

Today, the National Association of Basketball Coaches (NABC) felt like giving their player of the year award to Kevin Durant. I believe that means the over 5,000 members in the NABC wish Kevin Durant was on their team. But did not go to the lengths of Danny Ainge, and sit next to Durant's mom at the Big XII Tournament.

Now, I'm sure this award is extremely prestigious. I mean it's the National Association. Of Coaches. In Basketball. Yeah, we're waiting on the Naismith award too. But according to Texas Sports (the only mention I could find of the award, not that I actually looked hard.) we can win a 3rd award from Oscar Robertson too. And really, don't we all want the approval of the Big O?

In other news, several sources have reported that Kevin Durant is still enrolled at the University of Texas. That means we still have a chance, right?


Of note:

-Glen "Big Baby" Davis announced he was going to forgo his senior season and enter the NBA draft. I think Big Baby learned a lot coming back from his junior season. Namely, that he made a huge mistake coming back for his junior season. I don't think anyone is surprised at this since, well, LSU sucks.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2007/news/story?id=2805642

-In a surprise story today, reports are saying that New Mexico has about come to terms with Iowa head coach Steve Alford to take over for the Lobos. Wait, when did Steve Alford get fired from Iowa? He didn't get fired? He voluntarily left? Wow, what does it say about the stature of your program when your coach leaves to go to New Mexico? Better yet, what does it say about New Mexico? That they're committed to playing physical, ugly, slow, non-entertaining basketball, and want to show they're a program that is determined to make it to the NIT every year? Also, how does Iowa rebound from this loss...hire any of the 75% of available coaches across the country? Seriously though, a good hire for New Mexico, except that they're probably paying him 1.5 million a season, and Iowa is probably just getting a head start on what would've been taking place in two more years anyways.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=2807516

I concur...

Nice article from today's Washington Post -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/20/AR2007032001632.html

The text from the article:
A Feel-Good Story Reaches a Cliffhanger

By Sally Jenkins
Wednesday, March 21, 2007; E01

So far, everyone has done the right thing by Kevin Durant. The trick is not to do the wrong thing now. Why is it necessarily the smart choice for Durant to risk becoming another soured, over-moneyed performer with a leaner of a shot, playing too many minutes on a last-place NBA team that needs him to boost attendance?

You wait generations for a kid like this, a player so perfectly built it's as if he came from a kit. Watching Durant, you get the feeling that his parts were put together right, all the joints fit smoothly into the grooves, and everything is screwed tight, but not too tight. Just right. Every motion he performs seems correct, from the way he squares up to shoot to his courteous manner as he holds open a door. What's clear is that Durant is the product of great care and patience. What's also clear is that he shouldn't hasten his entry to the NBA if he's not ready.

Durant's draft status has been a subplot throughout his freshman season at Texas. With the Longhorns' elimination from the NCAA tournament last weekend, a decision looms: Should he make himself available, despite the fact that he's just 18 and probably 20 pounds too light, or stay in school? For some reason, the stakes seem higher for Durant than for other players who will be making the same decision. Maybe that's because he has the potential to be a three-octave performer if he continues to develop so beautifully. Or maybe it's because he's plainly so young for his age, and college so clearly suits him. "I do think this," Texas Coach Rick Barnes says. "I think he's never been happier."

He's something else, too, something you don't see much any more in the NBA, or college either. He's unspoiled. It's the great irony of Durant's situation: The thing that NBA teams and sneaker companies love most about him could be undermined by too-early entry to the league.

Fortunately, evidence suggests that his family doesn't believe in get-rich-quick schemes and is carefully outlining the pros and cons before making a decision. Durant already exhibits a promising trait: a sense of his own shortcomings. He gets this from his mother, Wanda Pratt. He was a senior at Montrose Christian School before she praised him for something he did on the court in the last game of his high school career. He had 31 points and nine rebounds and helped beat rival Oak Hill, the nation's top-ranked team, at the buzzer. "And she didn't say I played a great game," he says, "she just said I played a good game."

Durant's mother was a taskmaster by necessity. She was single for much of his childhood, raising him while separated from her husband Wayne, a security guard at the Library of Congress. Wanda, a postal office supervisor, rose every morning at 5:30 and was at work by 7, so it was Kevin's job to do all of the household chores -- clean the kitchen and wash the dishes, take out the trash and scour the bathrooms.

To keep Durant occupied after school, Wanda sent him to the Seat Pleasant Activity Center, where he picked up a ball for the first time. He was only 7 or 8, and he couldn't dribble or shoot, throwing the ball up from his shoulder. But even then, it went in. "I was horrible," he says. "But for some reason I would hit jump shots."

One night he went home and told his mother he had decided to be a ballplayer. Wanda treated the statement gravely. "Sleep on it," she said, "and tell me tomorrow if you're serious." When he said he meant it, Wanda turned him over for rigorous training to a Seat Pleasant coach named Taras Brown, who insisted he give up the pleasures of pickup and practice fundamentals instead. Brown made Durant dribble around cones, practice jab steps, and shoot the ball a thousand times a day. He conditioned by crab-walking up and down the court 10 times, balanced on his fingers and toes. Forward first, and then backwards.

Worst of all were sprints up a 50-yard hill near the center, sometimes as many as 25 a day, which would leave him doubled over in pain at the top. From the peak, he could see the Washington Monument. "I hated that hill," he says. "Sometimes I wonder where [Brown] got that stuff from. I think he was crazy. Because that's not right."

He got no sympathy from Wanda, who if anything was even more demanding. When his worksheet called for 25 sprints, she would double it. "I think my mom's crazy, too," he says.

The goal of all that work has always been the NBA. Now that the opportunity is here, no one could blame Durant if he decides to seize it. The rewards of the draft are hard to resist -- and maybe he shouldn't. The choice is not simple: If he stays, he risks injury and could forfeit millions. If he goes, he forfeits time.

What's the best way for him to become a finished player? That's the real question. The finish is what counts; there are millions of aspirants in the world who start things and don't finish them, much less properly, whether novels, carpentry projects or to-do lists. Anything of real quality requires finish.

What brought Durant this far was a certain order and thoroughness, he is all about working in an organized way toward an end. Everything the family has done to date suggests that they see this as a slow, steady step-by-step process, one that has stressed fundamentals over shortcuts. They may decide that Durant won't be improved by haste now.

Peace out Jody

For a good portion of my childhood, I really believed I was going to play basketball for Jody Conradt. Then I realized I was short, white, and really, just not that good. I moved on to other dreams. But I can imagine the huge number of girls growing up in Texas that had the same idea that I did. Sure, I'm sure some had dreams of the lovely smells of Lubbock and Marsha Sharp, but if they were smart, their eyes were on Conradt. And now, after 900 wins, she's done. It's one of those things that you know has to happen one day, but you never actually believe it's going to happen. And I guess once you hit 900 and you haven't led your team to the NCAA tourney in 2 years, you start feeling like you're done. You have to think it was all her decision - the Texas athletic department is notoriously loyal to its staff (i.e., somehow David McWilliams is still employed by the Department, and not to mention, Greg Davis still has a job.....). There's no way DeLoss or Polonsky would try to push her out after just 2 disappointing seasons. So good for Jody - she's bowing out on her own terms. She deserved that. She did enough not only for UT women's basketball, but also for the game in general that she deserved the respect to stay until she felt she was done. So after a season that before it began had so much promise - Tiffany Jackson and her senior leadership, a young, quick, sharpshooting backcourt only to be followed by devastating injuries including losing Erika Arriaran for the season, she called it a career.

So, time for a new chapter in UT women's bball - and it looks like that chapter will start with the hiring of Baylor head coach Kim Mulkey-Robinson. One of Baylor's only bright spots in the past how many ever years, she led the Lady Bears to the NCAA championship in 2005. But it rumored that she is VERY unhappy with Waco - not Baylor necessarily, but Waco itself and specifically Midway ISD - in which her kids are enrolled. Word on the street is that deal is pretty much done and everything is just waiting on Baylor to get bounced from the tourney before a million dollar deal between Mulkey-Robinson and Texas is announced. There are some whispers though, that since the LSU job has opened up, Mulkey-Robinson might have a change of heart and head home to Louisiana. There's pretty much no question that this is her last season at Baylor. Personally I think she's a lock for UT. For years rumors have been speculating that she had a strong interest in succeeding Conradt at Texas and she's just been waiting around for the opportunity to arise. Honestly, I've never been that big a fan of her coaching style from the bench. There's just something about her - she seems argumentative, maybe more a drill sergeant than a coach? I'm not sure, but I can't argue that it hasn't been successful for her. I'm just not sure how she'll fit in around the Texas athletic department. She seems a little too wound up for those folks... Just my $0.02, which doesn't mean much.... I haven't watched a women's college basketball game all year.........

The NBA (Really) Wants Kevin Durant...(Sigh)

Well, this looks like the first in what may be a long line of Kevin Durant and the NBA stories to come. It seems Mr. Danny Ainge (Boston Celtics GM) could not wait even until the NCAA tournament started to start wooing Durant away from Texas. In a stroke of “fortuitous” seat placement, Ainge found himself next to Wanda Pratt, mother of the Longhorn super star.

The NBA has very specific rules regarding the contact of NBA teams and “amateur” college players. Fines are laid out to any organization that makes substantial contact with a college player, or even discusses that player and their NBA prospects. Seems pretty tough, but straightforward. Well, it seems Ol’ Danny figured that an impromptu sales pitch in front of 18,000 people at the Big 12 tournament and the million or so watching on TV was a pretty covert scheme.

Needless to say, David Stern was not impressed. The Celtics were dropped a $30,000 fine for Ainge’s visit with Mrs. Pratt. But this was actually the third time a team has been fined by the NBA for comments about Durant. It seems Kevin has already begun taking the money of NBA execs to the tune of $60,000. The Golden State Warriors have already paid $15,000 for the privilege of saying Kevin Durant’s name, and none other than Michael Jordan and the Charlotte Bobcats were levied a similar $15,000 fine. (To be fair MJ just pulled that from his pocket after taking $30K from Charles Barkley on a par 3, closest to the pin competition).

I guess this is what Longhorn fans are left to. I was trying to think of an analogy of what watching Kevin Durant being courted by the NBA is like, but I am coming up short. But it sucks. Yeah, everyone knew he would only be here for a season and we are all glad he was here. But after the abrupt end to the year, the time seems all to short. But, I guess we had KD for a season longer than anyone else in the nation. Right?

The best I can do is say this must be what its like to have your kid leave for college. You know, even when they are born, that you have a limited time until they leave you for greener pastures. But by the time they are 18 and walking out the door you think, “Wait. That was it? Where’d the time go?” And worse yet, you know they should leave. Even though, for your selfish reasons, you want them to stay, their opportunities lay elsewhere. So you just enjoy the time you had and watch from a distance while everyone else gets to see what you had to yourself; even for just a short time.

Still doesn’t make me feel much better…

Thanks....No Really, Thanks.

It's the morning after and still there isn't too much to say about a game that wasn't close, really at any point throughout. USC showed up ready to play and attacked, and had a successful game plan for combating Kevin Durant. Texas left their intensity, hustle, fire, and game somewhere in Spokane. Perhaps in the coming days we will hear more about the on-going investigation as to the circumstances involving the disappearance of Texas' game. If the Trojans sent their cheerleading squad to our hotel, I'm going to be pissed...that we didn't think of that.

After a game like that, you wonder whether you should even address it, but really, if we really were going to do that, why have a blog. It seems like Floyd knew how to attack the Texas defense, and had a successful game plan for pushing Durant away from the basket. Also, one of the first teams all year to double Kevin Durant outright, showed that it was a good decision. But, as we've known all year, this team lives and dies with DJ Augustin. And with DJ having one of his worst games of the season, we had no chance.

Many are going to point the finger at Barnes. He's been under a lot of scrutiny this season for the way he gets Durant involved, for the team's cohesion on the offensive end, and for at times the lack of defense. He will probably be questioned a lot after this one as it seemed that we had no answer for anything USC was prepared to do, and appeared to lack intensity and focus. While I agree with some of the criticism that Barnes has taken this year, I don't know how much of the blame he can take for this one. Barnes was working with Kevin Durant and AJ Abrams. DJ Augustin was having the worst game of his life, but even then you have to leave him in. In times like these, we have to rely on someone else on the roster to step up and fill the void. Justin Mason, Damion James, and Connor Atchely have come through at different points throughout the season. Yesterday, on the biggest stage, no one stepped up. Barnes tried different combinations of Mason, James, Atchely, Craig Winder, JD Lewis, and Matt Hill to try and find some combination that gave us 4 basketball players on the court. No matter what Barnes tried, he ended up with two, Durant and Abrams.

I could talk more about the game, but that would only result in me wanting to jab something sharp in my eye even more. This game wasn't close at any point. We didn't' come to play, perhaps we were looking ahead to North Carolina, but either way, the point is moot. It's pointless to break down a game when no small adjustments would've affected the game in any sort of way.

Instead, it's interesting to look ahead the future. The number one question on everyone's mind will be, is Kevin Durant done? The answer has to be yes. I hope you enjoyed it. There can't be any reason why he would come back. What does he have to work on? What does he have to prove? Why would he turn down that much money? It just doesn't make any sense for him to come back. Though if we were trying to get him to come back, losing so convincingly in the second round might leave enough of a bad taste in his mouth that he'd want another shot at it. Durant has been an unconventional guy all his career, from his loyalty, to his high school choice, to his college choice, to the way he handles himself on and off the court. But, still, why would he come back?

The more interesting question is with what other parts of the roster will be back? We thought early on that we were losing Durant and James after the season. Well I think the first 3/4 of the season for Damion James took care of that question and he will be back for another season. The other question that emerged was the status of DJ Augustin. While he is ranked high on some draft boards, I think the last few weeks of marginal to sub-marginal play pretty much showed many people, and hopefully DJ himself that there is still room for lessons to be learned and things to be improved on. I think the disaster that was this USC game was just the icing on the cake that will lead to a hungry Augustin coming back for his sophomore season.

Another interesting aspect will be the biggest change from this year to next (Given that Durant is gone) will be the style of play. With 3 power forwards coming in next season, and the expanded roles of Matt Hill and Dexter Pittman, Texas should and will return to it's more recognizable role as a physically dominating inside-out team. I think both Hill and Dexter will have impact seasons along with Connor, who has shown this season he is getting close to breaking through, and I think one of the freshman will be ready to contribute. That's just the law of averages, I think. But Justin Mason will have to make some strides in the off-season and come back playing well to justify his spot in the starting lineup, as the makeup of next season's team kind of makes you think that you will see Damion James playing some small forward to allow Connor and Matt Hill to play the power forward spot, with Dexter at the center spot. I think we will be very versatile next season, though we will be a little thin in the back court, with Augustin, Abrams, Mason, and JD Lewis, depending on the strides, if any, that Harrison Smith makes. Just shows how important DJ Augustin coming back is for this team next season.

The last interesting question in the off-season will be what will the coaching staff next season look like? Several of the assistants have been named in head coaching searches over the past few seasons, and each has been with the program for a few years. Potentially, we could see the departure of one or two assistant coaches, which should cause an interesting shift in the make up of the staff.

The ending to the season left something to be desired, as everyone in Longhorn nation and around the country were captivated to see what Kevin Durant could do. To go out the way we did is a disappointment and leaves a bitter taste in everyone's mouth. Some would say it's times like these that you must stick together, put in the work, and come back with a renewed fire next season. I don't totally agree with. I think you need to find one person that you can focus all that anger and pent up rage on, and just fully with all your heart, despise that person.

I think it's safe to say our 2007 "Thanks...no really, thanks, jackass" Award goes to Mike Williams. Thanks Mike. We didn't need a 6'10" 240 pound forward who is a defensive presence and had an offensive breakthrough last season in the tournament, and would've been a starter all season. Thanks, hope you enjoy Cincinnati. Oh, just in case you didn't realize it...you actually have to make the Big East Tournament each season. Good luck with that. Thanks....no really, thanks.

vs. USC (24-11) - Sunday, 5:15 pm ET, Spokane, WA

Not looking pretty at any point in particular, Texas advanced past New Mexico State with a 79-67 victory. Texas got a glimpse into how most tournament teams will attempt to attack them. New Mexico State forced the ball inside with their two centers Martin Iti and Passos. While neither player had played a huge role for the Aggies this season, both were extremely effective scoring inside and on the offensive and defensive glass. New Mexico State also effectively slowed down Texas' offense and disrupted their rhythm by denying DJ Augustin the ball throughout the game. Finally, the Aggies attempted to limit Durant's touches and frustrate him when he got the ball by keeping an off the ball defender in the vicinity of Durant. This forced Justin Mason, Connor Atchely, and Craig Winder to beat NMSU more often than any Texas fan would like.

Texas will most likely continue to face these problems from every opponent the rest of the way. Texas will probably not have as many problems getting Augustin the ball as USC is not a team that will press as much as NMSU did. But USC will probably find different ways to deny Augustin the ball as Texas doesn't operate as effectively without the ball in DJ's hands. The weakness that we've been worried about all season showed up with Damion James in foul trouble, as New Mexico State had their way inside against Connor Atchely and Matt Hill. Texas will need Damion in the game and playing larger than his 6'7" stature. As for team's trying to limit Kevin Durant, I think it's foolish to hope that Justin Mason will find his early season form, and we will need to continue to rely on solid, confident play from Craig Winder and Connor Atchely making himself a presence on offense and defense. Though we could benefit from Kevin Durant demanding the ball a bit more offensively and figuring out his spots in the game to attack.

USC comes into the game off a solid 17 point win against Arkansas, in a game that they controlled from start to finish. USC is led by their junior small forward Nick Young. Averaging 17.4 points a game shooting 45% from 3 point range, Young is an inside-outside threat that will be a challenge for Mason, Winder, and Durant who should draw the defensive call against him. Also, Texas will have its hands full inside against freshman forward Taj Gibson (12.0 ppg/8.4 rpg) who had a great first round game against Arkansas. Matching up for Texas shouldn't be too much of a problem as USC will run three to four guards at all times. Point guard Gabe Pruitt (Jr. 12.5 ppg/4.1 apg) and Lodrick Stewart (Sr. 13.9 ppg/3.5 rpg) are the backcourt for USC. Pruitt runs the show and Stewart is dangerous from long range where he shoots 45%. While USC is a team that does not shoot a lot from outside they do shoot it well and will take advantage of open looks. The rest of USC's roster is made up of youth and athleticism as guards Daniel Hackett (Fr) and Dwight Lewis (Fr) play important roles. USC also has a lot of size off the bench as they will use Rousean Cromwell (So. 6'11"), Keith Wilkinson (So. 6'10"), and Abdoulaye N'Diaye (Sr. 6'11").

The one area that Texas will really have to deal with is the size of USC. With Pruitt and Stewart at 6'4" and Hackett and Lewis at 6'5", Augustin and Abrams will have to deal with more size then they are used to offensively and defensively. Though Augustin and Abrams should be able to cause problems with their quickness. Also, Damion James should be able to cause some problems with his size and quickness on the offensive end. Really, this game will come down to Kevin Durant and how USC is able to defend him. They will have to be creative in how they defend him as any of the guards will not be able to handle him inside or contest his shots on the perimeter. Also, USC will not want Young covering Durant because of the potential foul trouble, and any of the front court players will not be able to handle Durant inside or out. USC will most likely try to run a lot of players at Durant and use their guards to try and deny and use their quickness to harass him, and try and double team and make the other Texas players beat him.

Texas matches up well with USC and as long as Texas doesn't let USC get hot from the 3 point line and stays out of foul trouble, they should be able to handle USC and move on to a match up with North Carolina in the Sweet Sixteen.

Prediction: Texas 81-77.

vs. New Mexico State (25-8) - Friday, 7:25 pm ET, Spokane, WA

The dream begins Friday, and hopefully the legacy continues. Kevin Durant will lead the Texas Longhorns (24-9) into Spokane, Washington to take on the WAC champions, the New Mexico State Aggies (25-8).

New Mexico State earned an automatic birth into the tournament courtesy of their 72-70 win over Utah State. NMSU should have already put their thank you note to Utah State in the mail since the Aggies managed to avoid conference powerhouse Nevada thanks to Utah State's upset in the semifinals. The Aggies have won 7 of their last 9 and are lead by second year head coach Reggie Theus who has continued to improve each season. After a 3 game improvement to last year's 16-14 mark, the Aggies took the leap this season improving 9 games in the win column. Theus, an NBA veteran, spent 2 seasons at Louisville as an assistant to Rick Pitino before coming to New Mexico State. Much in the Pitino style, New Mexico State likes to push the tempo, which considering the Longhorns style could put this game in the upper 80s and low 90s in scoring.

New Mexico State is led by 1st team all WAC performer Justin Hawkins. The 6'7" junior led the team in scoring and rebounding (15.7 ppg/6.8 rpg) and is built much in the PJ Tucker mold. He could force Texas into more zone and larger lineups as Damion James should likely draw the assignment. The other front line threat for New Mexico State is 6'9" junior forward Tyrone Nelson who is averaging 11.8 ppg and 6.5 rpg. New Mexico State will rotate 6'9" junior center Hatlia Passos (8.5 ppg/6.5 rpg) and 7'0" junior Martin Iti (6.3 ppg/4.3 rpg). The Aggies back court is led by senior guard Elijiah Ingram (10.4 ppg/2.5 apg/42% 3P%).

New Mexico State will use 8 to 9 players in their rotation and Coach Theus does not hesitate to mix things up. Junior guard Fred Peete, a starter much of the season (9.7 ppg/4.1 rpg) did not play in the last three games of the regular season and has played sparingly since. He was replaced in the starting lineup by senior guard Ted Knauber (44 % 3P%), had only been averaged 12 minutes a game until his move into the starting lineup. Theus will call on his senior forward David Fisher and senior guard Shaun Davis off the bench along with Iti. Also, freshman guard Jonathan Gibson will see minutes off the bench.

Texas will be tested on the front line with the size and rebounding ability of New Mexico State. They are a team that is led by their front line and they attack inside and they attack the boards. Look for Texas to sit in a lot of zone to help combat their size and keep Texas out of foul trouble. If Texas is in man to man, look for New Mexico State to try and go at Durant to get him in foul trouble, since that is the only way they will be able to stop him. New Mexico State while not an outside shooting team by nature, has a few players who shoot well from the perimeter and NMSU as a team has been shooting well recently. New Mexico State should try to run several players at Durant to keep their top players out of foul trouble and to try and at least slow down Durant. Texas should be able to control the pace with superior back court play. Augustin and Abrams should be able to get free and wreak havoc on the back court of NMSU.

With Texas, you know what you are getting from Durant. He hasn't been in foul trouble all season, and Texas does a good job of putting him in a position where he will not pick up many fouls. Texas needs Abrams to be on-track from the get go. He's one of the few guys on this team who has played in a tournament game and his poise will be crucial. Most importantly, Texas needs DJ Augustin to get back on track. While his play has not been terrible, he hasn't been shooting the ball well and has been careless at times handling the ball. He is the key for Texas in this game and this tournament. He should be able to get to the rim a lot and get some of NMSU's front line in foul trouble.

Don't look for Justin Mason to get back on track in this game as his play down the stretch has been unimpressive and Craig Winder has been stealing his minutes and playing well in that role. Look for Texas to be in zone more often with Mason and Winder in the game since match ups defensively will be difficult with NMSU's size. Connor Atchely should play an important role if he can stay out of foul trouble and play effectively. He would allow Texas to match up with Damion James on Justin Hawkins. Also, look for Dexter Pittman and Matt Hill possibly stealing some minutes on the centers of the Aggies. Texas could see some extended time in the zone, and if that is the case, the rotation will need to significantly improve as teams got open looks from the perimeter during the tournament.

If Texas can at least stay close in the rebounding margin with New Mexico State and keep out of foul trouble, they should be able to dictate the pace of play, as New Mexico State will have trouble stopping the guards of Texas and that guy, Kevin Durant, he's kinda good. Look for Augustin and Durant to have a big day.

Prediction: Texas 87-79.

NCAA Tournament Preview

Its Tourney time, everybody! The greatest weekend in all sports is upon us. 64 NCAA basketball games in 4 days. This year’s bracket is loaded with talent from top to bottom, but the top 1-4 seeds are so strong that this year does not seem to be primed for as many upsets as past years (plus, Bryce Drew no longer plays college basketball). So without further ado, here is a short preview for the top four seeds in each region:

Midwest:

1. Florida Gators (29-5)- Last year’s champs are definitely battle-tested. Recovering from their only rough patch this year, the Gators dominated the SEC tournament; leading many to think that the Gators are gearing up into post season speed just in time. Florida is lead by All-Everythings Joakim Noah and Al Horford who both spurned the NBA, in hopes of a repeat trip to the Final Four and another National Champion.

2. Wisconsin Badgers (29-5)- The Badgers are led by Alando Tucker and Kammron Taylor but will sorely miss the play of injured Brian Butch (dislocated elbow). Runners up to Ohio State in the regular season and tournament, the Badgers look to prove they are not just the bridesmaids of the Big 10. Wisconsin has lost three of its last six, but if it can win its next six, the Badgers will be dancing in Madison.

3. Oregon Ducks (26-7)- The Ducks are definitely not a team to slow down the pace. Oregon runs out four starting guards in a similar fashion as Villanova last year. Despite hitting a 2-6 rough patch in the middle of the year, the Ducks rebounded to win their last six and the Pac-10 tournament. If their hot shooting continues, the Ducks will be a difficult draw this year.

4. Maryland Terrapins (24-8)- Maryland turned around a dismal start to the ACC season to become one of the top teams in the league. The Terrapins are balance on the offensive end. There are five players averaging 10 or more points a game. Any team with that kind of constancy will be a tough match up, with opposing teams not merely having to stop one or two players from scoring.

West:

1. Kansas Jayhawks (30-4)- One of the top two most athletic teams in the nation. The Jayhawks, winners of the Big Twelve regular season and tournament championships play strong defense and incredible quickness. Freshman Sherron Collins has proven to be a great court general for Bill Self and being able to dish the ball to the likes of Brandon Rush, Julian Wright and Mario Chalmers has eased the adjustment for the young point guard. The only question remaining is whether or not the “Curse of the Jayhawks” will return and once again knock Kansas out of the tournament early.

2. UCLA Bruins (26-5)- The Bruins were ranked number one for several weeks this season, but played themselves out of a number one seed by losing 3 of their last 8 and losing to Cal in the first round of the Pac-10 tourney. Lead by All-American point guard Aaron Afflalo, the Bruins are strong on the defensive front, only allowing opponents to score 60 points a game. A tough second game awaits the Bruins in either Gonzaga or Indiana.

3. Pitt Panthers (27-7)- The Pitt Panthers were finally able to beat a ranked team during the Big East Tournament, knocking off Marquette and Louisville. Before that, however, they were a dismal 0-5 versus top 25 teams. The Panthers feasted off of the weak, bottom dwellers of the Big East and must rely on the leadership of Aaron Gray to make any real effect in the tourney.

4. Southern Illinois Salukis (27-6)- The only “Mid-Major” with a top four seed this year, but have become a fixture, lately, in the NCAA tournament. However, the Salukis will have to adjust to not being considered an “underdog” this time around. So. Ill is not considered a threat to break into the final four, but you can expect that this experienced team will be a hard match up for anyone.

East:

1. North Carolina Tarheels (28-6)- Young, fast, athletic, facemask. These are all accurate descriptions of the ACC champion Tarheels. Leading scorer Tyler Hansbrough has shown little ill effect from the new facemask he must wear after suffering a broken nose against Duke. Freshman Ty Lawson is one of the top point guards in the nation, Hansbrough is a first tier post threat and Brandon Wright and Wayne Ellington are each averaging over 12 points a game. (Oh by the way, that’s three freshmen and a sophomore). UNC is young, but are poised to make a big run in a loaded region.

2. Georgetown Hoyas (26-6)- Maybe the hottest team in America, right now. The Hoyas seem like a trendy pick to end up in the Final Four. With seven players over 6’9”, the G’town will out size any team in the country. Led by 7’2” Roy Hibbert, these mammoth players will present match up problems all tournament long. If the Hoyas can take advantage of the size, control the boards and clock, Atlanta seems like a real possibility

3. Washington State Cougars (25-7)- The Cougars will have to prove that their record is not inflated due to a weak Pac-10 schedule. This team came into the season with very little expectation and even just a tournament bid was considered out of the question. 25 wins and a number 3 seed are nice for coach of the year candidate, Tony Bennett, but the Cougars want to prove they can keep their improbable season alive a few weeks longer.

4. Texas Longhorns (24-9)- Texas is considered the best four seed in the tournament. The Horns will ride Kevin Durant as far as he will take them. The East is loaded with talent, but the Longhorns are still considered a threat to challenge for the Region championship. For that to happen, Texas must improve on the defensive end and get more production from Justin Mason and the players off the bench.

South:

1. Ohio State Buckeyes (30-3)- Greg Oden is big. Really Big. This freshman phenom leads yet another team full of youngsters into a top seed. The Buckeyes are riding a 17 game winning streak and are a team that seems to be matured way beyond their years. Oden anchors the middle of the paint on offense and defense. Fellow freshman Mike Conley and Daequan Cook are the beneficiaries of the attention paid to Oden and have taken advantage on the offensive end. Age no longer seems to be a concern in the NCAA anymore, so there is no reason to think this young team will be at any disadvantage.

2. Memphis Tigers (30-3)- The Tigers will be shocked to see how strong this region is, in direct opposition to how easy their Conference USA schedule was. Though the Tigers are athletic, many feel they have not been truly tested yet this year and many are skeptical about how they will adapt to this level of play. Memphis looks to extend their, NCAA leading, 22-game winning streak just a few more games.

3. Texas A&M Aggies (25-6)- Defense and Acie Law. These are two things that can get a team to the Final Four. The Aggies have been ranked in the top ten nearly all year and have been a constantly strong team. The Aggies excel on he defensive end and rely on Joe Jones in the post and Josh Carter from the outside. But A&M has an “Acie” in the hole this year. Law’s heroics and leadership make the Aggies a really big threat to get out of this region and into the final four.

4. Virginia Cavaliers (20-10)- If guard play is essential for a run in the tournament, then the Cavaliers have two of the best. RJ Reynolds and Sean Singletary lead the ACC regular season champion into March. The Cavs might have one of the deeper teams in the field, having10 players who average over 10 minutes a game.

My Humble (and surely wrong) Predictions:

Final Four: Kansas, Florida, Ohio State, Georgetown
Finals: Kansas, Georgetown
Champion: Kansas, 76-65

Checking in on Life Without Cat

I was suprised as anyone when I saw that softball season was underway. I could've sworn I saw something that said with Cat Osterman graduating that they were going to disband the softball program all together.

But head coach Linda Clark is a visionary, and low and behold her gamble has paid off. Texas is back among the nation's elite just a season after losing all-everything pitcher Cat Osterman, and 4 other starters from last year's national finalist team. A month into the season and the team is continuing the winning tradition, off to a 17-3 mark, ranked 8th in the country.

This year's team is a youth movement, as much of the team is made up of freshman and sophomores. There is no question though as to who the leader of this team is as much of team turns to Meagan Willis to provide senior leadership on this very young team. Her handling of the pitching staff and her .333 average this season is crucial to Texas' early season success. As the season moves into the Big XII tournament, her role will continue to become more important.

However, as Cat Osterman showed us all over 4 wonderful years, is that for the most part softball is about a pitcher. With the void left by Cat, Texas has turned to Junior Meagan Denny and she has not disappointed. She has thrived in the role of #1 starter (I dont' think there are any more numbers after that when it comes to softball pitching staffs) posting a 10-2 mark with a 0.86 era. The big surprise has been the play of Freshman pitcher Erin Tresselt who has become the relief specialist posting a 5-1 record and a 0.77 era in 11 appearences this season. Between the two of them, Texas has been able to continue to succeed in the post-Cat Osterman era.

The biggest change from this team is the apparent change of attitude. Texas always seemed to fall short at the end of the season when opposing teams would get one run off Cat (I'm still shocked as to how they managed that) and manage to shut down the Texas bats and escape with 1-0 victories. This year's team knows that they cannot rely on their pitching to win them every game. This is evident in the team's current .292 batting average up .036 from last season. The ressurection of the bats are being led by freshman Loryn Johnson (.381/3/14), freshman Tallie Thrasher (.333/6/14), and sophomore Kacie Gaskin (.293/5/16).

The real test as to whether this team has the ability to go deep into the tournament still is yet to be seen, as the true test will be how they fair in conference, with #4 Texas A&M, #6 Oklahoma, and #16 Baylor laying ahead. But, this team appears poised to live up to the expectations set by Cat Osterman.

Men's Big XII Tournament Preview

With the Big XII tournament beginning this Thursday, it's time to preview each team's chances to take home the least important conference tournament championship in college basketball.

#12 Colorado (7-19) (3-13) - With only one quality player in Richard Roby (any relation to Reggie?) and a coaching staff that is likely on their way out, the Buffaloes started looking ahead to football season. Oh wait, started looking ahead to....

Well Colorado's season has been a disappointing one to say the least, and facing a Texas Tech team that needs a win to solidify its NCAA hopes, you can pretty much sum up Colorado's season with one thought: At least we haven't had any sex scandals.

#11 Baylor (14-15) (4-12) - A year that was supposed to be filled with promise was a bit of a disappointment for the Bears, as the perennial bottom dweller, well, dwelled in the bottom. The team shows a lot of promise as their influx of young talent has made this team no longer an easy walk over. This showed as the team won 2 of its last 4.

They should give Missouri a run in the opening round, and if they can get by Missouri, Texas will be disappointed as the Horns have won both meetings by a combined 6 points. But Missouri has been playing well and Baylor won't get by them.

#10 Nebraska (17-13) (6-10) - While Nebraska hasn't played well down the stretch, losing to Iowa State and Colorado, they did beat Oklahoma State. So they're not the fasting sinking ship in the Big XII. That wouldn't bode much confidence for their chances in the tournament, unless, they get to play Oklahoma State in the first round. Look for Nebraska to pull of the upset, if you can call it that in the first round, since I mean, their basketball team has a pulse.

But what are folks in Nebraska saying about their chances beyond the first round? Man, has that Sam Keller looks impressive in Spring practice.

#9 Oklahoma (15-14) (6-10) - What was expected to be a rebuilding year for Oklahoma has been exactly that. It was tough for Capel losing Scottie Reynolds and Damion James and not having a go to player on the entire roster.

What an enjoyable season to watch. After showing some promise by winning 4 straight, Oklahoma reminded everyone that they are in fact, not good by losing their last 6 to end the season. Look for it to be 7 straight against Iowa State, not that anyone in Oklahoma will notice.

#8 Iowa State (15-15) (6-10) - Is it me or is the bottom half of the Big XII just painful to watch. A collection of teams that aren't really worth a full paragraph. There's nothing really to note here, other than Iowa State consistently manages to be the model of mediocrity, by going 3-3 down the stretch alternating wins and losses. I'm sure Greg McDermott wishes he had stayed at Northern Iowa.

#7 Oklahoma State (20-11) (6-10) - The only thing that wouldn't have made this complete and utter collapse not painful to watch, would've been if we could've seen the Eddie Sutton bitter beer face during it all. Instead we have to watch Sean Sutton look completely overwhelmed as his team quit on him. 2-8 down the stretch. So much for 5 or 6 teams in the NCAA tournament.

This team is a debacle and could possibly have ramifications for the program for years to come. Sean, I think The Fray has a song just for you. Look for Nebraska to win back to back games and just make the pain end on the Pokes' season.

#6 Missouri (18-11) (7-9) - The only team in the Big XII North that actually showed anything this season other than Kansas. That still doesn't make them good, but their uptempo pressing style will continue to make them a tough game. They'll be even tougher when they get the personnel to play it. Should handle Baylor, can't stop Durant, but really? Who can?

#5 Texas Tech (20-11) (9-7) - Bob Knight teams always find a way into the tournament. While at times they looked great, and others they looked terrible, they managed to look like a questionable team. Then they win 3 straight get to 20 wins, and surely will be a lock after beating Colorado in the first round. Many think with the way they've been playing they'll get by Kansas State in the second round and give Kansas a run for their money. I kind of agree with Many.

#4 Kansas State (21-10) (10-6) - After winning 7 straight (6 in conference) Kansas State and Bob Huggins were the talk of the town. But after going 4-4 down the stretch with losses to Nebraska and Oklahoma State (How is that even possible?) Kansas State's tournament work is not done. They will most likely face Texas Tech in the second round and need a win to solidify their tournament hopes.

Regardless of what happens, the future looks bright at Kansas State, and really, one must wonder at what point in the whole Bob Huggins saga did Cincinnati actually think it was making a good decision? You, enjoy Cincinnati Mike Williams, good decision there, really good decision.

#3 Texas (22-8) (12-4) - The ankle is okay. And with that, so are the Horns' tournament chances. While a run to the title game is possible, getting by A&M on a neutral floor will be extremely difficult. Durant is going to dominate games and could raise his play to another level, much like he did in the first half of the Kansas game. But, the post-season hopes of the Longhorns will rest on DJ Augustin. If he plays well Texas will be dangerous, if he struggles, we're a one pony show.

If Texas does end up playing A&M in the semi-finals of this tournament, who will the fans in Oklahoma City be cheering for? Will they boo both teams? Will they cheer for the Hornets? Or will they just wait for the Sonics to move to town?

#2 Texas A&M (25-5) (13-3) - This is the environment Texas A&M and Billy Gillespie basketball is made for. With a deep and experienced roster, and a team that plays hard nosed pressure defense and comes at you for 40 minutes, A&M is tough to beat on a neutral floor. Throw in Acie Law and the crap that he pulls out in close games, A&M is going to be playing for the Big XII title.

#1 Kansas (27-4) (14-2) - They keep saying that this Kansas team is different than the last two years. I thought they said that last year? Either way, Kansas is loaded and can play with anyone. They also have another gear, as they showed in the Texas game, that almost makes them unstoppable. They could face a very hungry Texas Tech team which could catch them sleeping. Otherwise, look for them to get a great game from Texas A&M in the finals.

But really, I think this team is just waiting biding its time until it can start worrying about how it's going to choke in the tournament this season. This team may be different then the last two, but one key element remains: Bill Self.

Predictions, Round 1: Tech over Colorado, Missouri over Baylor, Nebraska over Oklahoma State, Oklahoma over Iowa State.

Predictions, Round 2: Kansas over Oklahoma, Tech over Kansas State, Texas over Missouri, A&M over Nebraska

Predictions, Semis: Tech over Kansas, A&M over Texas

Predictions, Finals: A&M over Tech

Conradt wins 900th, to replace Barnes?

The Texas women got off on the right foot tonight in the first round of the Big XII Tournament as they handled the 10th seed Missouri, 70-59. Texas used a 46-27 first half lead to coast to a second round match up against #2 seed Oklahoma.

Led by freshman Earnesia Williams 17 points, and Tiffany Jackson's 12 points and 14 rebounds Texas kept themselves in the hunt for a birth into the NCAA field of 65. While they could be given an at large birth after tonight's win, Texas would all but assure themselves of a place in the field if they can knock of #12 Oklahoma. But that's no small task. (See: Courtney Paris)

More importantly for the Longhorns the win marked the 900th of the illustrious career of head coach Jody Conradt. After failing to record the win last week against A&M, the Lady Longhorns were able to get Coach Conradt over the hump, making her the second head coach ever in women's basketball to reach that mark.

While we are happy for Coach Conradt and the Lady Longhorns, we would like to ask ESPN and all other media outlets to just say congratulations, recognize Conradt as one of the greatest women's coaches of all time and leave it at that. I don't think anyone can take another three weeks of comparing Conradt and Summit's achievements to Bob Knight, Dean Smith, and Adolph Rupp. And I guess while we're at it, should we nip the "Should Conradt be the Men's basketball coach?" story in the bud.

I think to be safe, I just won't watch Sportscenter in the morning.

Congratulations Coach Conradt on 900.

Women’s Big 12 Tournament Preview…Really.

In what can only been seen as one of the most competitive years in recent memory for the Big 12, A&M and OU have come out of the pack as Regular Season Co-Champions and favorites to claim the Conference Tournament Championship as well. The current ESPN Bracketology has seven Big 12 teams getting into the NCAA tournament. This is quite a feat considering the highest predicted seeds are A&M & OU’s at #4. This is just proof of how evenly matched the Big 12 has been and will be in the conference tourney. Here is a breakdown of each team's chances:

#1 Texas A&M 23-5 (13-3)- All-around the best team in the league. Led by Big 12 Coach of the Year, Gary Blair, the Aggies have 4 of their 5 starters on either the 1st or 2nd All-Big 12 Team or the All Defensive Team. The Aggies look to improve on their NCAA seeding and claim their first ever Conference Tournament Championship.

#2 Oklahoma 23-4 (13-3)- Led by Big 12 Player of the Year and Defensive Player of the Year, Courtney Paris, the Sooners enter the tourney with one of the best players in the NCAA. Averaging 24 ppg, 16 rpg and 3.41 bpg, Paris is a force for any team to deal with.

#3 Baylor 24-6 (11-5)- The latest addition to Women’s basketball powerhouses, the lady Bears continue to have success in the NCAA and Big 12. This year’s team is a strong team that has experience and wants to go deep in both post-season tournaments. The Bears are led by Big 12 Newcomer of the Year, Bernice Mosley.

#4 Nebraska 22-6 (10-6)- Led by 1st Team All-Big 12ers Kelsey Griffin and Kiera Hardy, the Cornhuskers look to improve their NCAA tournament seeding with a strong Big 12 showing. When Husker fans were asked about the Women’s Basketball Team’s chances, most replied, “Are you sure you don’t mean Men’s Football? Cause either I have some corn niblets in my ear or you just suggested that there is a sport called basketball and supposedly women are allowed to play it.” (Actual quotes by real Nebraskans).

#5 Iowa State 22-7 (10-6)- Convinced by their coach that the only way they were allowed to escape the suffocating hell of Ames, Iowa was to dribble a round ball and put it into a basket, the Lady Cyclones have put in hours of hard work to make this dream come true. However, Iowa State coach Bill Fenelley has expressed concern of defection if the Lady ‘Clones are placed in a NCAA regional site that is “too close to mimicking 21st century luxuries.” (again an actual quote (probably anyway))

#6 Oklahoma State 20-9 (8-8)- The Lady Cowpokes are clinging to NCAA hopes. A loss to the lowly Jayhawks will ensure OSU will be playing in the even more irrelevant Women’s NIT.

#7 Texas 17-13 (6-10)- The latest Bracketology has Texas as one of its “Last Teams In.” This makes the tourney more important to Texas than any other team. They absolutely need at least one win to have any shot at the Big Dance, but a trip to the semi-finals (meaning a win over OU) would have the Horns dancing.

#8 Colorado 17-16 (6-10)- Being one game over .500 doesn’t guarantee your team a lot; Unless you are the Lady Buffs, which ensure that you would able to beat your men’s team in a 5-on-5. (Not shirts and skins. Get your minds out of the gutter).

#9 Texas Tech 15-15 (6-10)- Once mighty Texas Tech has been relegated to the unfamiliar role of “Also-ran” this year in the Big 12. The Lady Raiders look to gain some much-needed experience headed into the NIT.

#10 Missouri 17-12 (5-11)- One thing is clear. Either the Big 12 conference is the hardest in the nation or the Missouri Tigers played a bunch of High School teams in pre-conference. There’s really no other way to explain a deterioration like this (well, maybe there is, but I didn’t look into it).

#11 Kansas 10-19 (4-12)- The only team in the conference with an overall losing record does not bode well for the Jayhawk’s chances this weekend. I guess crazier things have happened (like me writing a Women’s Basketball article).

#12 Kansas State 16-13 (4-12)- Coming off a 12-1 pre-conference showing, the K State Wildcats were disappointing in the Big 12 year; indicated by their seeding in the tournament. The Wildcats will need to make quite a run to pull off an upset Tournament Championship and get a spot in the Final 65.

DJ Augustin: One and Done, Too?

The speculation about Kevin Durant leaving early for the NBA is obvious. If you are guaranteed to be no worse than the number 2 pick in the draft, there isn’t much upside in staying in school for another year (see, twisted ankle against Kansas). What has become more intriguing are the questions about freshman standout, DJ Augustin, leaving the 40 Acres after just one year.

There are two current sources providing the answer to these rumors, but you would be surprised as to which way each source is making me lean in questioning the time DJ will spend in Austin.

The first evidence presented is DJ’s own statement that he will be back next year. You might think this would lead to a conclusion that DJ will, in fact, be back next year. However, this statement has been proven to hold little meaning after the season is over. In fact, if you take a look at recent Longhorn stars that have proclaimed their mid-season desire to return for another college season (TJ Ford, LaMarcus Aldridge, PJ Tucker and Daniel Gibson), DJ’s statement seems more and more ominous. And if you remember correctly, TJ was 99.9% sure he was coming back before bolting to the league. (On a related note, there must be something lost in translation with UT athletes and the use of statistical probability. Wasn’t Texas legend Roger Clemens 99.9% sure he was retiring with the Yankees and now we are in our 3rd off season of “Waiting for Roger?” We should look and make sure UT athletes aren’t taking Stats class from a paint-by-numbers coloring book…)

(Another side note: Is it just me, or has the “I’ll be back next year” almost replaced the GM’s dreaded “vote of confidence” as far as a coach’s concern level goes? A statement like that from the GM, will immediately precipitate a call to the coach’s family realtor. But now, a coach hearing a star player profess his interest in a degree will immediately start the recruiting process for a blue-chip replacement. Something to think about, anyway.)

Ironically, the one thing making me feel like DJ may return is a recent ranking by ESPN’s Chad Ford that has Augustin ranked as the number 16 NBA prospect in the nation. (It’s a pay link so if you cant see all of it; you just have to trust me). Now, why, you ask, does this make me feel ok? Its because of the seemingly lack of any common sense or sports knowledge displayed by Ford in his “rankings.”

Any list that has DJ Augustin ranked higher as a pro prospect than Acie Law (#19) is immediately null and void in my book. Are you kidding me, Chad Ford?! Have you even SEEN Acie Law play basketball at any point in time this season? If you had, there is no way you can keep that guy out of the top 10, much less almost put him out of the top 20. Absolutely ridiculous.

The second, third and fourth glaring areas are the fact that Mr. Ford has ranked Chase Budinger as his #12 prospect, Josh McRoberts as his #13 and, then fourth, proceeds to put Tyler Hansbrough as his 32nd best prospect. So many things make no sense about any of this. Budinger is a decently talented forward, averaging less than 16 points on an unranked Arizona Wildcat team. I am not saying he isn’t an eventual pro prospect, but there is no way you can call that guy one of the top 15 amateur basketball players in the world.

And don’t even get me started on Josh McRoberts. All you have to do is look at Duke’s tract record of putting white guys in the NBA (Thank you very much Cherokee Parks) and see what kind of pro potential this guy has. And how in the world can you have watched the UNC/Duke game on Sunday and thought that McRoberts is anywhere near Hansbrough in talent?

I could go on, but I will just point to these few examples and say that Mr. Ford’s “expertise” has convinced me that DJ is not ready to be a lottery draft pick at this point. But with one more year experience, it is not out of reach to say that Augustin could be the best PG prospect in the draft. That is reason enough for DJ to spend one more year as a Horn.

CBS, Definitely Not the Sports Leader

This weekend I was in Washington DC putting the final touches on the newest addition to the writing team here at Drinking the Forty. After the deal was closed I obviously went out, had too much drink, and somewhere during the evening signed a cricket correspondent. That's another story for another time.

Saturday around noon, like any good Texas fan, I began my search to catch the Kansas game. Big XII title on the line, number three versus number fifteen, the best player in the country, at one of the most hostile environments in the country. Must see television isn't it? Well, unfortunately, NBC seems to be the only network that has "Must See TV".

Now I understand the concept of regional coverage, and frankly it works well. I'm sure a majority of people in the northeast could care less about Kansas against Texas, let alone know where Lawrence, Kansas is (Not that I really do). Georgetown versus Connecticut is probably a much more prevalent game considering Georgetown is in the District. However, you figure with two to three bars in the District that tend to show Texas games or a plethora of college basketball, you would think that one could find the Texas game. Well after making a search of eight to ten bars and contacting several people in the know in the District, (we even thought about calling or Congressman) we came to the painful realization we weren't going to be watching the game.

Seriously though, wouldn't a bar, with multiple televisions think to show a game between two powerhouse teams that will draw fans, from an area with a large Kansas and Texas contingent? I think so. Which leads me to wonder, does CBS have regional availability for out of region viewers? I could see not doing that for someone in their home, but bars kind of thrive off that kind of business. Also, it means that since CBS has top games every week there are fans across the country, that are as pissed as I was. I mean it's one thing to not know how to put together a sports broadcast as well as other networks, but to just not know how to handle a gold mine like NCAA basketball; it's just frustrating. I mean in all the years that they've been covering the NCAA, they just now realized that it might be a good idea to make available all the 1st round games? Wow, give that guy a raise!

What explanation do I have for all of this? I think it's pretty obvious. Just like the BCS in college football, this is the NCAA's way to make sure we don't enjoy college sports too much. I suppose dealing with a network that could maximize the NCAA's product would way to smart. Why mess with a good thing when you could have a great thing. Thanks Myles, thanks.

Durant Wins Several Acronyms: POY & FOY

Kevin Durant adds two awards to his soon to be overflowing trophy case. Along with being named a unanimous selection to the All Big 12 First Team, Durant adds the titles of 2006-07 Freshman of the Year and Player of the Year in the Big 12.

Following an unprecedented year during Big 12 play, Durant led the league in both points and rebounds per game (29.3 ppg, 13.1 rpg). Durant was also the first player in the history of the Big 12 to score 400 points and grab 200 rebounds in one Big 12 season.

While the Freshman of the Year honors were a forgone conclusion many games ago, the overall Player of the Year award came down to the wire between Durant and Texas A&M's Acie Law. In any other year Law's numbers (20.8 ppg, 4.9 apg) would have garnered him such accolades, this year he was competing with one of the most dynamic players in NCAA history.

There was, however, a good argument to be made on Acie's part. Many feel the POY should be the best player on the best team, and that was arguably Acie Law for A&M. You would be hard pressed to find a more clutch player in the Big 12 this year. As Texas and Kansas can attest to, Law seemed to elevate his game to an annoyingly high level (for Texas fans anyway) against the best competition in the league.

In the end, though, the most talented player with the highest stats won out for the annual award. The only major award left for Durant to recieve will be the Naismith National Player of the Year awarded later this year. Durant seems to be the favorite thus far in the season to win (with Law, Wisconsin's Alando Tucker, UCLA's Arron Affalo and Ohio State's Greg Oden as the top contenders). Durant would be the second Texas player to win the National POY as T.J. Ford took home the award in 2003.

Cricket Correspondence: England Destroys Bermuda in World Cup Warm-Up

In a dastardly display of domination, England took advantage of the beautiful St. Vincent weather on the way to a crushing 286-8 win over Bermuda 45 by 241 runs. A favorite in the upcoming World Cup, England put in a solid performance punctuated by Jamie Dalrymple’s 76 just after Dwayne Leverock’s two wickets had the Brits up by 132-5. Simply outclassed, the Bermudian batsmen were no match for tough English bowlers vying for a spot on the 11-man World Cup starting squad. The match marked a sad day for Andrew Strauss who missed out on Michael Vaughan’s line-up after 74 successive ODIs for England due to some poor form in Australian league play. On an edgy note, Ed Joyce did get his chance and was promptly bowled by a gentle yorker in the third over. Nonetheless, it was all smiles for England after a match that could easily be classified as easier than a day in the life of an east-ender.

Seriously, where did he go?

So, after being asked to join the "staff" (call it what you will) of this fine piece of journalism, I had to come up with a display name. Took me awhile, but then a vision of the most handsome, perfectly chisled square jawed quaterback entered my head and before I knew it, a name was born. Which leads to my first post - what the heck happened to Marty Cherry? Last we heard, he left the sidelines of Memorial Stadium to enter the masucline world of modeling. Really, who could blame him though? After solidifying his place on the "Guys who did bad things in some of UT's worst memorable games ever" list, with his 9 for 18 with 2 INTs and a fumble after taking over for Richard Walton in the worst home loss ever Texas, 66-3 at the hands of UCLA. We were ranked like #11 going into that game. I was there. For the entire thing. Seriously, I'm pretty sure we stayed to the end and were 4 of a grand total of probably 10 left in the west side upper deck to sing the Eyes of Texas at the end. But I digress - back to the issue at hand.... At this painful game, a photograph caught sight of Cherry on the sideline and thus his door into the modeling world was opened. It looks like Marty moved from the field to some photo shoots for Abercrombie & Fitch. I am not able to find any photos of Marty modeling for A&F, which is quite unfortunate, as we know that most A&F photos have actually very little to do with the clothes. I've also found that he moved on to Polo Ralph Lauren, but oddly enough little is mentioned of him on el internet. No images found on google, and the only articles found are those talking about the UCLA disaster or discussing his departure from the team in 1997. So where is he now? Somebody somewhere has to know what happened to Mr. Cherry. He'd be about 32 these days, which isn't too old for a male model, but with no reference to him anywhere, it's hard to imagine he's still in business. Maybe someone caught sight of him on the catwalk and he walked away from modeling to yet another career. What comes after football and modeling? My guess is the kid is either in real estate or car sales.... isn't that where all former UT players end up? Whatever happened to him, he's still perhaps the prettiest QB to ever wear the burnt orange.

Next time: What ever happened to Ron McElvey/Weaver?

Texas, Durant Fall at Kansas

What, seemingly, started as a Longhorn upset and a big game for Kevin Durant...

Soon turned into another Jayhawk Regular Season, Big 12 Championship and an ankle injury for Durant:

Up next for the Horns: The Big 12 Tournament, Mar. 8-11.